|
Schemefighter (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@IndyFan53Methane is a global warming gas. Methane ice or methane gas is not something you spill into the soil. Perhaps I should use language that you might understand. Cow farts are largely methane gas. I'm tired on wasting my time on the dishonest moron like you. You can't even have an intelligent honest conversation. It's like trying to discuss the theory of relativity with a kindergartner.
Schemefighter (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@IndyFan53What the heck is wrong with you? Your reply has nothing to do with what I said. If you think your reply is relevant to what I said then you must not even have a high school level understanding of science. How come most of you ethanol supporters seem to be totally inept? You seem to be greedy ignorant shills just spewing simpleminded rhetoric. You don't seem to have a clue what you are talking about.
Schemefighter (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@IndyFan53So is Panda Ethanol the company you are shilling for? The company is trying to use the carbon credit con to get money from the government under the guise of helping the environment when in fact it is helping to deplete agricultural soil? The company that filed for bankruptcy protection? You still haven't answered my questions, instead you just spew more manure.
Schemefighter (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@IndyFan53It seems that you are more concerned with shilling for industry than actually doing what's good for the environment or our country.
Schemefighter (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@IndyFan53At the methodologies that you propose are likely to produce the very antithesis of the platitudes that you spew. By not letting the manure go back into the soil your depleting the soil which is unsustainable (nonrenewable). The methodologies that you propose sound less labor and energy-efficient. The methodology is it that you propose would make us more dependent on high priced petroleum based fertilizers.
Schemefighter (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@IndyFan53I would think it would be more environmentally friendly and more energy-efficient to use manure as fertilizer rather than fuel. Are you connected to some profiteering industry like EarthRenew which is exploiting the environment and the hysteria from the global warming movement and the oil crunch?
Schemefighter (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@IndyFan53As I said before the safety and environmental standards are higher in the US so it makes things more expensive but safer. IIRC unlike in other countries; In the US manure can't be used directly on food crops it has to be composted and aged to reduce the bad bacteria and viruses. In countries in South America and Asia they allow fresh manure to be used on food crops and sewage water is used for irrigation. Which is partly why those countries have much more health issues.
Schemefighter (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@IndyFan53So if you object to using the manure based fertilizer, then what do you suggest? Depleting the soil till it's no good for farming like they do in many parts of South America and other parts of the world? Do you know it was practices like that that caused the dust bowl and reduced our agricultural production? Or are you suggesting that we use more man-made petroleum fertilizers? That would seem less environmentally friendly and less energy-efficient.
Schemefighter (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@IndyFan53It's not known for sure what caused the E. coli outbreaks in the US. It is thought that the E. coli outbreaks in the US was from runoff water containing feces from a nearby cattle farm, or from dear or wild pigs that raided the crops.
IndyFan53 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Schemefighter It's not just for environmental reasons, it's to help America stop giving into the high prices of petroleum and to create buisness oppurtunities. |